Editorial policy

Responsibility for the content

Pureza publishes and is responsible for the content of this site. Articles are attributed to the organization; bibliographic references identify the authors of the studies cited.

Pureza also sells research compounds and laboratory supplies. This commercial relationship should be kept in mind when reading the content. The bibliography lets readers consult the sources and distinguish what a study describes from product information.

The content has a defined scope

Product pages explain identity and research context. Articles explore specific questions; comparisons organize differences; the glossary defines terms. A publication about a molecule is not presented as proof of quality for every vial bearing its name.

The text must distinguish an isolated compound, a blend and an experimental formulation. When a source studies a specific variant, its conclusion does not automatically apply to another.

Sources readers can consult

References may link directly to PubMed, a DOI or an institutional source. Each link lets readers identify the document and consult the context of the research.

A review brings together studies; a primary study describes its own experiment. The text must indicate the context of a finding and avoid presenting a preclinical observation as a promise of an individual outcome.

How we handle incomplete information

We do not fill in sequences, formulas or identifiers based on similarity to another molecule. An absence must remain explicit until sufficient documentation is available. Blends require the same care: a combined formula is not invented from the total weight of a product variant.

The site's references also do not replace the batch certificate. Analytical figures or accreditations must only be attributed to the document and material that support them.

Corrections and review dates

You can report an error through Pureza's contact channel. Include the URL, the text you noticed and, if possible, a source that allows it to be checked. You do not need to write a complete editorial proposal to point out a discrepancy.

The review date identifies a review of the content, not the publication date of a cited study or the date of a laboratory test. A correction to the text does not retrospectively change the results of an external document.

Frequently asked questions